Elon Musk Seeks 25% Voting Control of Tesla to Lead in AI and Robotics

In a recent tweet, Tesla CEO Elon Musk stated “I am uncomfortable growing Tesla to be a leader in AI & robotics without having ~25% voting control. Enough to be influential, but not so much that I can’t be overturned. Unless that is the case, I would prefer to build products outside of Tesla. You don’t seem to understand that Tesla is not one startup, but a dozen. Simply look at the delta between what Tesla does and GM. As for stock ownership itself being enough motivation, Fidelity and other own similar stakes to me. Why don’t they show up for work?”

Based on the tweet, it seems Elon Musk is referring to wanting 25% voting control, not necessarily 25% ownership, in Tesla. A few key phrases support this:

  1. He says “25% voting control”. This directly states he wants 25% of the voting power.
  2. He talks about having enough control to be “influential” but still able to be “overturned”. This suggests he wants voting power, but not complete unilateral control. 25% would allow him to have a strong voice but not total control.
  3. He contrasts his desired voting power with the ownership stakes of passive investors like Fidelity. The difference is they own shares but do not actively participate in voting or management.

So in summary, he wants 25% of the voting rights in order to have an influential but not totally controlling stake in determining the direction of Tesla. The ownership percentage itself seems less relevant to him – it’s the voting power that he explicitly states is important. Is this the right take? I’m not sure as I am reading tea leaves without Elon clarifying his statement.

Update with Elon’s additional comment: “I should note that the Tesla board is great. The reason for no new “compensation plan” is that we are still waiting for a decision in my Delaware compensation case. The trial for that was held in 2022, but a verdict has yet to be made. I put “compensation plan” in quotes, because, from my standpoint, this is primarily about ensuring the right amount of voting influence at Tesla. If I have 25%, it means I am influential, but can be overridden if twice as many shareholders vote against me vs for me. At 15% or lower, the for/against ratio to override me makes a takeover by dubious interests too easy. I would be fine with a dual class voting structure to achieve this, but am told it is impossible to achieve post-IPO in Delaware.”

This verifies Elon Musk is seeking more control over Tesla rather than greater ownership. Tesla has two main options to grant him that control – grant Musk with additional shares contingent on meeting specific performance metrics, or Tesla could repurchase shares and therefore reduce number of outstanding shares.

More Articles for You

Now There’s Talk Of Autonomous Flying Cars

Yes, we’ve been hearing about flying cars for over a decade now, but they are in the news again. And …

Mercedes-Benz Malaysia Teases Its New GLB For Second Time

The Mercedes-Benz GLB has undergone a facelift, and it appears that the SUV will soon be unveiled since the company …

It’s Not Just Cars—Off-Roaders And ATVs To Go Electric Too 

The electric revolution is branching out. Not content to electrify just cars, manufacturers are now looking to introduce a range …

Sentinel Automotive Partners With Zeekr In Malaysia

So who’s heard of Sentinel? Last weekend, we saw a Zeekr X electric vehicle (EV) with right-hand drive (RHD) cruising …

New York City Crushes Controversial Congestion Charge Plan

You’ve heard of the £15 (@$20) congestion charge that Londoners have to pay to enter their fair city every weekday. …

BMW X3 Final Edition Lands In Malaysia Before All-New Model Arrives

To highlight the end of an era, BMW Malaysia has just debuted the Final Edition models of the BMW X3 …