Audi Goes Back To Its Old Naming Strategy After New One Deemed Confusing

Audi unveiled a new naming strategy back in 2023 that turned out to be not as popular as it had expected.  Its internal combustion engine (ICE) and completely electric (EV) versions were to be clearly distinguished by having odd numerals for ICE and even numbers for EVs.

Production at the Neckarsulm plant

The outcome? The Audi A4 was renamed the A5, and the A6 was supposed to be replaced by the A7 of the following generation. The A4 and A6 names will live on as EV models. Confused? We were too. The German automaker appeared to be experiencing some sort of naming conundrum. They even went out on a limb and introduced a new brand in China, called, strangely —AUDI.

Familiar Audi-like suffixes to be employed

Two years on, Audi has now indicated that it will be returning to its previous naming strategy, in which the numbers will represent the car’s size rather than its powertrain configuration, suggesting that this was also too confusing for the company, and, well, its customers. In order to determine a model’s powertrain, the following suffixes will be employed: TFSI (Internal combustion engine), TFSIe (Plug-in hybrids), TDI (Diesel), e-Tron (Fully-electric).

Marco Schubert, a member of Audi AG’s Board of Management for Sales and Marketing, says, “This decision is the result of extensive discussions and also follows the wishes of our customers as well as feedback from our international dealers.”

The first model to adopt this “new/old” name strategy will be the next-gen Audi A6. Crucially, this switch will only apply to future models.. It is assumed that existing models will not be renamed in order to prevent further confusion. This is obviously for the better since it makes things clearer for both consumers and the media.

Additionally, Audi will retain flexibility by continuing to offer ICE vehicles in the foreseeable future, even though the company has announced plans to transition to a fully electric brand by 2033.

CARLIST THOUGHTS

As the proverb says — Simplicity is Best. And with Audi’s naming strategy, that definitely seems like the right choice. Go back to what the market knows and is comfortable with. To be honest, we are surprised that the company decided on such a radical intervention in the first place. Hopefully now, things will calm down.

More Articles for You

New Kia EV5 Debuts In Singapore As First Model To Be Assembled There

Kia’s electric EV5 has finally been introduced into Singapore after making its debut at the local motor show earlier this …

New Morgan Supersport Blends Retro With 21st Century Tech

At Morgan, change happens gradually. Over the 116-year history of the British company, the cars’ appearance and feel have remained …

Toyota Planning Big EV Push With 7 Models For North America

There’s some big news from Toyota. According to Bloomberg, Japan’s No 1 carmaker plans to launch seven new all-electric cars …

Callum Designs Reveals Sensational Jaguar E-Type Restomod

Boasting an enviable portfolio that includes the Aston Martin DB7, Jaguar XK, and F-Type, former Jaguar design director and current …

Phantom Goldfinger Debuts At Villa d’Este Event To Celebrate Centenary

A double homage has just been paid to one of the world’s most spectacular cars at arguably the world’s premier …

Geely’s Radar King Kong PHEV Packs A Massive 914 Nm Of Torque

The handle may sound a bit over the top, but Geely really did just name its latest plug-in hybrid SUV …