Audi Goes Back To Its Old Naming Strategy After New One Deemed Confusing

Audi unveiled a new naming strategy back in 2023 that turned out to be not as popular as it had expected.  Its internal combustion engine (ICE) and completely electric (EV) versions were to be clearly distinguished by having odd numerals for ICE and even numbers for EVs.

Production at the Neckarsulm plant

The outcome? The Audi A4 was renamed the A5, and the A6 was supposed to be replaced by the A7 of the following generation. The A4 and A6 names will live on as EV models. Confused? We were too. The German automaker appeared to be experiencing some sort of naming conundrum. They even went out on a limb and introduced a new brand in China, called, strangely —AUDI.

Familiar Audi-like suffixes to be employed

Two years on, Audi has now indicated that it will be returning to its previous naming strategy, in which the numbers will represent the car’s size rather than its powertrain configuration, suggesting that this was also too confusing for the company, and, well, its customers. In order to determine a model’s powertrain, the following suffixes will be employed: TFSI (Internal combustion engine), TFSIe (Plug-in hybrids), TDI (Diesel), e-Tron (Fully-electric).

Marco Schubert, a member of Audi AG’s Board of Management for Sales and Marketing, says, “This decision is the result of extensive discussions and also follows the wishes of our customers as well as feedback from our international dealers.”

The first model to adopt this “new/old” name strategy will be the next-gen Audi A6. Crucially, this switch will only apply to future models.. It is assumed that existing models will not be renamed in order to prevent further confusion. This is obviously for the better since it makes things clearer for both consumers and the media.

Additionally, Audi will retain flexibility by continuing to offer ICE vehicles in the foreseeable future, even though the company has announced plans to transition to a fully electric brand by 2033.

CARLIST THOUGHTS

As the proverb says — Simplicity is Best. And with Audi’s naming strategy, that definitely seems like the right choice. Go back to what the market knows and is comfortable with. To be honest, we are surprised that the company decided on such a radical intervention in the first place. Hopefully now, things will calm down.

More Articles for You

Volvo Car USA Partners With Artist EJAE On New Track “Time After Time”

Volvo Car USA has partnered with South Korean award-winning singer songwriter EJAE to explore the car as a creative studio …

Nissan’s New 3rd Generation Leaf Picks Up Multiple Awards

The all new Nissan Leaf has been honored as Best EV in the 2026 MotorWeek Drivers’ Choice Awards, adding to its …

BYD Joins Commonwealth Games As Official Partner For Glasgow 2026

BYD, the world’s top New Energy Vehicle (NEV – fully electric and plug-in hybrid cars) has become the Official Car …

About Time! Subaru Begins Production of Battery Electric Vehicles at its Plant In Japan

Subaru Corporation has begun the in-house production of Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs), including the all-new E-Outback, at its Gunma Yajima …

McLaren Launches Limited Edition Artura Spider MCL39 To Celebrate 10th F1 Championship

McLaren Automotive celebrates McLaren Racing’s 10th Formula 1 World Constructors’ Championship victory – and back-to-back world championships – by curating a …

Mercedes‑Benz Accelerates Future Robotaxi Ecosystem And Collaborates With NVIDIA

Mercedes‑Benz is pioneering a new era of automated driving by accelerating the development of a robotaxi ecosystem. The car manufacturer …