Audi Goes Back To Its Old Naming Strategy After New One Deemed Confusing

Audi unveiled a new naming strategy back in 2023 that turned out to be not as popular as it had expected.  Its internal combustion engine (ICE) and completely electric (EV) versions were to be clearly distinguished by having odd numerals for ICE and even numbers for EVs.

Production at the Neckarsulm plant

The outcome? The Audi A4 was renamed the A5, and the A6 was supposed to be replaced by the A7 of the following generation. The A4 and A6 names will live on as EV models. Confused? We were too. The German automaker appeared to be experiencing some sort of naming conundrum. They even went out on a limb and introduced a new brand in China, called, strangely —AUDI.

Familiar Audi-like suffixes to be employed

Two years on, Audi has now indicated that it will be returning to its previous naming strategy, in which the numbers will represent the car’s size rather than its powertrain configuration, suggesting that this was also too confusing for the company, and, well, its customers. In order to determine a model’s powertrain, the following suffixes will be employed: TFSI (Internal combustion engine), TFSIe (Plug-in hybrids), TDI (Diesel), e-Tron (Fully-electric).

Marco Schubert, a member of Audi AG’s Board of Management for Sales and Marketing, says, “This decision is the result of extensive discussions and also follows the wishes of our customers as well as feedback from our international dealers.”

The first model to adopt this “new/old” name strategy will be the next-gen Audi A6. Crucially, this switch will only apply to future models.. It is assumed that existing models will not be renamed in order to prevent further confusion. This is obviously for the better since it makes things clearer for both consumers and the media.

Additionally, Audi will retain flexibility by continuing to offer ICE vehicles in the foreseeable future, even though the company has announced plans to transition to a fully electric brand by 2033.

CARLIST THOUGHTS

As the proverb says — Simplicity is Best. And with Audi’s naming strategy, that definitely seems like the right choice. Go back to what the market knows and is comfortable with. To be honest, we are surprised that the company decided on such a radical intervention in the first place. Hopefully now, things will calm down.

More Articles for You

Do You Talk To Your Car To Cope With Christmas Chaos?

Fed up with festive traffic, last-minute shopping and endless family logistics? You’re not alone, and it seems many British motorists …

Alpine Teases Final Version Of A110 In New Video

Alpine is marking the conclusion of its 70th anniversary celebrations with a powerful new video connecting its past to a …

Nissan’s Leaf Named InsideEVs Breakthrough EV Of The Year

Nissan’s all-new Leaf EV has been picking up awards left, right and center. It has earned significant recognition, including being …

Honda Aircraft Company Debuts New HondaJet Upgrade

Honda Aircraft Company today announced the HondaJet APMG S, a new performance upgrade package for owners and operators of HondaJet Classic …

Porsche Cayenne Electric Is A Newsweek Most Anticipated Vehicle For 2026

Following in the footsteps of the Macan Electric, Porsche’s first-ever electric SUV, the new Cayenne Electric has just been unveiled …

JAECOO Is The UK’s Most Googled Chinese Car Brand In 2025

JAECOO has been named the most searched Chinese car brand in the UK, according to Google UK’s Year in Search …