Audi Goes Back To Its Old Naming Strategy After New One Deemed Confusing

Audi unveiled a new naming strategy back in 2023 that turned out to be not as popular as it had expected.  Its internal combustion engine (ICE) and completely electric (EV) versions were to be clearly distinguished by having odd numerals for ICE and even numbers for EVs.

Production at the Neckarsulm plant

The outcome? The Audi A4 was renamed the A5, and the A6 was supposed to be replaced by the A7 of the following generation. The A4 and A6 names will live on as EV models. Confused? We were too. The German automaker appeared to be experiencing some sort of naming conundrum. They even went out on a limb and introduced a new brand in China, called, strangely —AUDI.

Familiar Audi-like suffixes to be employed

Two years on, Audi has now indicated that it will be returning to its previous naming strategy, in which the numbers will represent the car’s size rather than its powertrain configuration, suggesting that this was also too confusing for the company, and, well, its customers. In order to determine a model’s powertrain, the following suffixes will be employed: TFSI (Internal combustion engine), TFSIe (Plug-in hybrids), TDI (Diesel), e-Tron (Fully-electric).

Marco Schubert, a member of Audi AG’s Board of Management for Sales and Marketing, says, “This decision is the result of extensive discussions and also follows the wishes of our customers as well as feedback from our international dealers.”

The first model to adopt this “new/old” name strategy will be the next-gen Audi A6. Crucially, this switch will only apply to future models.. It is assumed that existing models will not be renamed in order to prevent further confusion. This is obviously for the better since it makes things clearer for both consumers and the media.

Additionally, Audi will retain flexibility by continuing to offer ICE vehicles in the foreseeable future, even though the company has announced plans to transition to a fully electric brand by 2033.

CARLIST THOUGHTS

As the proverb says — Simplicity is Best. And with Audi’s naming strategy, that definitely seems like the right choice. Go back to what the market knows and is comfortable with. To be honest, we are surprised that the company decided on such a radical intervention in the first place. Hopefully now, things will calm down.

More Articles for You

Hyundai Releases ‘A Safer Way Home’ Unmanned Firefighting Robot For High Risk Blazes

Hyundai Motor Group (the Group) today released a video, ‘A Safer Way Home,’ introducing the Unmanned Firefighting Robot — first unveiled and …

BMW To Deploy Humanoid Robots In Production For First Time

The BMW Group is advancing the digitalisation and use of artificial intelligence in production. A key element in this effort …

Fully Electric Volvo EX30 SUV Wins Good Design Award 2025

Since the Volvo EX30 was launched in 2023, it has won the World Urban Car 2024, Carwow’s Car of the …

According To EPA, Honda Is No.1 Full-Line Automaker In Fuel Efficiency

Honda leads the U.S. auto industry with the highest fleet average fuel economy of all automakers producing a full line …

Some 70 Cars Compete In Second Running Of 1000 Miglia Experience USA Florida 

Three days of racing, thousands of spectators along the route and a high-level international audience proved the success of the …

Renault 5 E-Tech Electric Captures UK Car Of The Year 2026

The Renault 5 E-Tech electric has been crowned overall UK Car of the Year 2026, adding the UKCOTY awards’ highest …