Audi Goes Back To Its Old Naming Strategy After New One Deemed Confusing

Audi unveiled a new naming strategy back in 2023 that turned out to be not as popular as it had expected.  Its internal combustion engine (ICE) and completely electric (EV) versions were to be clearly distinguished by having odd numerals for ICE and even numbers for EVs.

Production at the Neckarsulm plant

The outcome? The Audi A4 was renamed the A5, and the A6 was supposed to be replaced by the A7 of the following generation. The A4 and A6 names will live on as EV models. Confused? We were too. The German automaker appeared to be experiencing some sort of naming conundrum. They even went out on a limb and introduced a new brand in China, called, strangely —AUDI.

Familiar Audi-like suffixes to be employed

Two years on, Audi has now indicated that it will be returning to its previous naming strategy, in which the numbers will represent the car’s size rather than its powertrain configuration, suggesting that this was also too confusing for the company, and, well, its customers. In order to determine a model’s powertrain, the following suffixes will be employed: TFSI (Internal combustion engine), TFSIe (Plug-in hybrids), TDI (Diesel), e-Tron (Fully-electric).

Marco Schubert, a member of Audi AG’s Board of Management for Sales and Marketing, says, “This decision is the result of extensive discussions and also follows the wishes of our customers as well as feedback from our international dealers.”

The first model to adopt this “new/old” name strategy will be the next-gen Audi A6. Crucially, this switch will only apply to future models.. It is assumed that existing models will not be renamed in order to prevent further confusion. This is obviously for the better since it makes things clearer for both consumers and the media.

Additionally, Audi will retain flexibility by continuing to offer ICE vehicles in the foreseeable future, even though the company has announced plans to transition to a fully electric brand by 2033.

CARLIST THOUGHTS

As the proverb says — Simplicity is Best. And with Audi’s naming strategy, that definitely seems like the right choice. Go back to what the market knows and is comfortable with. To be honest, we are surprised that the company decided on such a radical intervention in the first place. Hopefully now, things will calm down.

More Articles for You

Jaecoo J7 PHEV Delivers Astonishing 1,200 km Range Into Malaysia

Forget your electric vehicles. For many buyers it will be hard to ignore a stylish SUV that delivers no range …

New Morgan Flagship Is In The Pipeline Boasting Classic Looks

Even though these official photos reveal a camouflaged prototype Morgan’s new flagship model, we are glad to see that the …

Tesla Plans To Launch More Reasonably Priced Cars By End Of Summer

Following its first yearly drop in sales since rocketing to the electric vehicle world leader, Tesla is about to introduce …

Record-Breaking 800K Units Flood Malaysian Car Market

In 2024, the Malaysian automobile market exceeded forecasts by selling a record-breaking 816,747 units, or Total Industry Volume (TIV). Compared …

Trump Is On The Verge Of Messing With Foreign Car Imports

With the mountain load of executive orders signed over the last 10 days that have overwhelmed the media, and the …

Britain’s Radical Motorsport Celebrates 3,000th Car And 28th Anniversary

It all started in 1996 when Brit car designer Phil Abbot built Radical’s first car based on a Kawasaki motorcycle …